Your ultimate insurance guide


Post-Katrina Role Of Property Insurers Threaten Consumers Nationwide

"Prediction is very hard, especiallyand insurance models are non-accessible.
when it's about the future." YogiThus, more scrutiny not less has been
BerraGiven the focus on the recentcalled for.But deregulation has also
one-year anniversary of Hurricanebrought about insurance products sold
Katrina by the media and governmentworldwide as investments and annuities
officials and its label as the mostand reinsurance companies which provide
costly catastrophic disaster in Unitedcatastrophic coverage for domestic
States history, there has been littleinsurers primarily are located overseas.
focus on the nationwide impact theTherefore, in a global economy, federal
property and casualty insurance industryoversight is far more necessary than in
has started to impart on homeowners andthe past. Leaving global oversight up to
businesses in a post-Katrina world.Therestate regulators is arguably negligent
has been serious discussion aboutgiven the ramifications of lack of
reforming U.S. insurance laws in thecoverage during a catastrophe.The
U.S. Congress since 2004, before fourinsurance industry itself has been
hurricanes battered the Florida coastcampaigning for some type of legislative
and well before the Katrina and Ritareform to provide for a federal
storms hit the Gulf Coast in 2005.catastrophic fund which would subsidize
However, the insurance industry sinceinsurers in cases of terrorism and
Katrina is now not only fightingnatural catastrophes. The American
hundreds of individual and class actiontaxpayer and consumer have gotten their
lawsuits in Mississippi and Louisiana infill of that, however, where the Federal
the wind v. water debate, but alsoEmergency Management Agency (FEMA) has
advocating change in the event of futurebeen and continues to pay out damages to
catastrophic events.Thethe Gulf Coast states and primarily the
McCarran-Ferguson Act, enacted in 1945,City of New Orleans for rebuilding
delegated sole enforcement of insurancecosts, with FEMA's National Flood
regulations to the states, where it wasInsurance Program (NFIP) to homeowners
believed better oversight would takeand businesses and for FEMA housing
place rather than federal governmentcosts for the displaced.But an
mechanisms. However, state regulatorsunexpected phenomenon followed the 2005
are not law enforcement agencies and dohurricane season and is primarily
not have the benefit of the arm of thefueling the fires for insurance reform
federal government in cases which areand that is the record high premium rate
beyond their means. Now, many statehikes on homeowners as well as
insurance commissioners, members of thecommercial property policies. In
Congress as well as consumer advocacyaddition, hundreds of thousands of
agencies believe that the whittling awaypolicies are being dropped and
of consumer protections over the yearsnon-renewed by the country's two largest
and recent staggering premium hikes,insurance companies, namely State Farm
with little public disclosure, builds aInsurance Co. and Allstate Insurance
case for federal insurance legislationCo., from the Gulf Coast all the way up
and industry reforms.Since 1945 theto the tip of Maine.Even more
insurance industry has enjoyed anunexpected, however, were renewal
antitrust exemption and the viability ofdenials for inland properties for
that rule has been seriously discussedpolicyholders in the Northeast including
and revisited by the Congress. ThereNew York City, where property owners
have been state accusations of pricehave never even previously filed a claim
fixing and price gouging along withfor property damage. With premiums on
collusion in the industry leavingthe Gulf Coast having at least doubled
consumers with little information aboutsince 2005, thousands of dollars have
their homeowners and business propertybeen added to mortgage loans. In some
policies, with only the civil orcases, many homeowners policies were not
criminal courts left for recourse. It isrenewed at all, preventing homeowners
argued that the antitrust exemption onlyfrom obtaining mortgages or rebuilding
fuels such a scenario.The proposedat all.With insurers' withdrawal from
National Insurance Act of 2006 (S.B.writing homeowners policies throughout
5209) introduced by the Senate Bankingregions of the U.S. and gutting those
Committee on July 11, 2006, would allowwith less and less coverage for those in
insurers to be licensed under a federalplace, the industry believes it will be
umbrella license, to choose betweenable to stay healthy. Astonishingly, in
federal or state regulation and to do2005 it made a record profit of $45
business in any state without need ofbillion post-Katrina and after four
state licenses. The U.S. Department ofstorms in 2004 it realized a profit of
the Treasury would then have$38 billion.The models associated with
jurisdiction to regulate such nationalrisk management amongst insurers are
insurers. Arguments against such analso changing. The 100-year average of
arrangement cite more endlesshistory for forecasting future
bureaucracy and red tape with fears thathurricanes, for example, is presently
individual states would not be equallybeing revised. And as those methods of
treated.Alternatively, the Statecalculations become murkier, homeowners
Modernization and Regulatorycan hardly feel safe or comfortable when
Transparency (SMART) Act introduced inpurchasing new properties. There are
2004 addresses market conduct, licensingalso several states which only allow for
and antifraud data exchanges but hasthe issuance of property insurance based
failed numerous times to move throughsolely upon a consumer's credit history
the legislative process. It would leaveand income which makes it far more
regulation up to the states but todifficult for the working class consumer
comply with uniform standards withoutto be able to purchase insurance.Over
federal oversight. The attempt tothe next year, 43% of the U.S.
"modernize" the regulatory framework ofpopulation which covers 18 states can
the insurance industry has becomeexpect their policies to either be
synonymous with deregulation and appearsdropped by their insurance carriers or
that resistance on both sides of thehave their premiums escalate between 20%
argument makes reform more and moreand 100%. And for that reason alone it
insurmountable along with immensemight be time to reel in an industry
struggles to provide sufficient deliverywhich not only is in business to make a
of adequate insurance for propertyprofit, but also has a moral obligation
owners.The repeal of theto help protect communities nationwide
McCarran-Ferguson Act has also caughtand such becomes necessary in the face
the attention of the Senate Judiciaryof absolute destruction.Copyright ©2006
Committee which held a hearing on theDiane M. Grassi
issue on June 27, 2006 for the firstContact: Diane M. Grassi is a freelance
time since 1994, precipitated bycolumnist, reporting and writing
numerous complaints of less and lesscommentary on current events of the day
public disclosure of information andproviding honest and often politically
devices used for premium calculations.incorrect assessments. From U.S. public
Such has impeded consumers from making apolicy to Major League Baseball, she is
proper decision when purchasingan eclectic thinker, and demanding of
policies. Travis Plunkett of theher readers to reflect on their own
Consumer Federation of America (CFA)thinking patterns from an alternative
testified that "Insurers wantperspective. Whether you agree with her
competition alone to determine rates,or not, Diane M. Grassi will have you
they say. How about a repeal of thecoming back to note her opinions, and if
McCarran-Ferguson Act to test theirat best she wakes you up, then her goal
desire to compete under the same ruleswill have been accomplished.Ms. Grassi
as normal American businesses?"The CFAis featured with the online
has also called for regulation to ensurepublications: New Media Journal.us;
consumers have availability of enoughAmerican Chronicle; Mich News.com;
information in order to compare pricingOpinions Editorials; the Conservative
of policies between insurers in order toVoice; Renew America .us; Liberty Watch
make informed decisions. Unlike the wayMagazine as well as many others. She
most consumer service products arealso writes regular columns on Major
purchased, insurance costs are basedLeague Baseball where she is a featured
upon a non-finite uncertain condition toonline columnist with The Diamond Angle
happen some time in the future. AndBaseball Ezine and Sports-Central.org.
consumers must rely solely upon theMs.
agent, especially when actuarial tables



1 A B C D 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111